<div>Just my 2cents on the Revo 1600 I have. I had a stick of Memory Lieing arround, so I have 512MB dedicated to the GPU. I play back HuluDesktop low Quality at 80% CPU without skipping, sure it's not HD, but it looks good enough for me (and more importantly the Wife). I play back mp4's encoded with handbreak, 2600bitrate (I think, i do about 1.5gig/hr) and they play back flawlessly. h.264 obviously. I do not know what deinterlacer I'm using at the moment. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>To me, it's best $200.00 I've spent. Now if flash ever get's accelerated somehow on linux, I would have to look into that option, but Hulu Has become less and less used as of late, so maybe not. <br><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM, David Asher <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asherml@gmail.com">asherml@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>On Sep 2, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:<br><br>> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 10:39 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:<br>>> MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 59 frames/s<br>>> MPEG DECODING (1280x720): 134 frames/s<br>
>> H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 52 frames/s<br>>> H264 DECODING (1280x720): 105 frames/s<br>>> VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 67 frames/s<br>><br>> Perhaps I am/was mis-interpreting these results. I had assumed that for<br>
> NTSC, 60 "frames"/s were needed for decoding but perhaps a frame in this<br>> context is indeed two fields as it is much elsewhere. In this case of<br>> course, only 30 frames/s is required for decoding. If so, then all I<br>
> can say is "sweet". :-)<br>><br>>> MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 196 frames/s<br>>> MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 277 fields/s<br>>> MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 63 fields/s<br>>> MIXER TEMPORAL + IVTC (1920x1080): 42 fields/s<br>
><br>> So this one is out for NTSC. But as was mentioned before, why would I<br>> use IVTC (which should be enough to de-interlace back into the original<br>> "progressive" content that something started out as) with another<br>
> de-interlacer, be it MIXER TEMPORAL, or (per below) MIXER<br>> TEMPORAL_SPATIAL?<br>><br>>> MIXER TEMPORAL + SKIP_CHROMA (1920x1080): 90 fields/s<br>>> MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 20 fields/s<br>
><br>> Abd this one is out too.<br>><br>>> MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL + IVTC (1920x1080): 15 fields/s<br>><br>> Ditto above re: IVTC.<br>><br>>> MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL + SKIP_CHROMA (1920x1080): 23 fields/s<br>
><br>> Also out.<br>><br>>> MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (720x576 video to 1920x1080 display): 78 fields/s<br>><br>> But this one is usable.<br>><br>> It would be nice/interesting to know how the above de-interlacer names<br>
> correspond to Myth's nomenclature.<br><br></div></div>I don't know what WEAVE is, but Advanced 2X (I believe this is TEMPORAL_SPATIAL) is more than the Revo 1600 can handle, while Temporal 2X (TEMPORAL) usually works -- I've had some anomalies, so I use Bob without any issues. I don't know what Advanced 1X and Temporal 1X map to.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>David.<br></font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Sincerely, <br><br>MacNean C. Tyrrell<br>