<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jyavenard@gmail.com">jyavenard@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi<br>
<br>
2009/6/6 Brian Long <<a href="mailto:briandlong@gmail.com">briandlong@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="im">> As I understand it, an ideal motherboard for VDPAU usage is one which<br>
> has the Nvidia 9400 IGP (i.e. Gigabit E2SL, etc). However, I've read<br>
> that the 9400 IGP cannot handle the most advanced deinterlacing<br>
> schemes like Advanced 2X and a discrete graphics card is required.<br>
> For about the same price as a Nvidia 9400-based board ($130), I could<br>
> get a cheap motherboard and a 9500GT or 9600GT. Since I'm looking to<br>
> keep things compact, I'm thinking a low-profile card makes the most<br>
> sense. What do you think?<br>
<br>
</div>The advantage with a 9400 IGP, is that it has full HDMI support<br>
including 8 channels LPCM support.<br>
<br>
You won't get that (yet) with a discrete video card...<br>
<br>
The 9400 IGP won't do Advanced 2X, but it does Temporal 2X on HD,<br>
which isn't that bad really.<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br>But it does advanced 2x on SD, correct? <br></div></div><br>