<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Chris Pinkham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cpinkham@bc2va.org">cpinkham@bc2va.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br></div>
My patch allows the scheduler to schedule recordings on slaves<br>
that the master has put to sleep. [...]</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Chris,</div><div><br></div><div>When nothing is recording, it sounds like it should be possible to put the master backend asleep as well, using the bios wakeup feature to wake it up a little before the next recording is scheduled (enough time to wake up any asleep slaves it might need to). Is this correct?<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>Also, what happens if a slave which has recordings stored on it has been put to sleep, and then a frontend wants to play a recording stored on that slave?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>
Jerry</div></div><br>