<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Daniel Carter wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/07/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Brad DerManouelian</b> <<a href="mailto:myth@dermanouelian.com">myth@dermanouelian.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div style=""><br><div>Of course, the best option is to use master and slave backends so you get the best use of all your tuner cards, then put each of your recordings into their own group and only display the group you want to see. Sharing is good. </div></div></blockquote><div><br>If you use recording groups to solve the recording schedule seperation, then why the need for master and slave backends? Put all your tuner cards in one machine to save on hardware costs and power usage etc. <br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>There's tons of reasons to split up your backend. I assumed he had one of them. </div></body></html>