in the current SVN it does. storage groups<br><br>mitchell<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Frascone</b> <<a href="mailto:dave@frascone.com">dave@frascone.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>I've read all the horror stories about the Raids. I had been thinking<br>I'd use LVM, and just add disks as I need them -- but that would suffer
<br>the same 100% loss on any disk failure.<br><br>Does Myth support using multiple filesystems for storing data? I'm<br>thinking that might be a way to mitigate loss if drive failure occurs.<br>Something like:<br><br>
/myth/disk1<br>/myth/disk2<br>.<br>.<br>.<br><br>Otherwise, I think LVM is probably the easiest solution -- but one day,<br>everything will be gone.<br><br><br>And, the disk question: I'm looking at segate barracude disks for
<br>roughly $.25/Gb on <a href="http://pricegrabber.com">pricegrabber.com</a>. I like segate since they have a 5<br>year warranty. I'm also thinking $50 for 200Gb disks sounds about right<br>-- When I need more space, drop in another 200Gb.
<br><br>Are there any glaring flaws in my plan?<br><br>-Dave<br><br>--<br><br>David Frascone<br><br> Nothing is foolproof because fools are so ingenious<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>