<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/14/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">John Drescher</b> <<a href="mailto:drescherjm@gmail.com">drescherjm@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><span class="q"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Isn't a single core on a Core Duo faster per cycle than an early Athlon 64?
</blockquote></span>
</div><br>Not much if any. Also the Intel graphics chips are way behind Nvidia and ati in terms of performance.<br><span class="sg"><br>John<br>
</span><br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>3D performance, perhaps...but I have a Windows box for that.<br>I'm more concerned about having an XvMC setup that would almost always work...
<br>