<span class="gmail_quote">On 12/13/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jay R. Ashworth</b> <<a href="mailto:jra@baylink.com">jra@baylink.com</a>> wrote:</span>.<br>
<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">What motherboard are you using?<br><br>Some earlier VIA boards (KT266? KT400?) had either interrupt or DMA
<br>collision problems. Perhaps that's what's biting you.</blockquote><div><br>
Some time ago, I had both the PVR cards in a KT400 system, but never
got them to work together properly. This was around the time of
ivtv 0.2 and early 0.3. I never put them back in that system to
see if things improved as the support for the PVR-500 matured in the
later drivers. I'm now using a Chaintech nforce2 motherboard and
the PVR's play nice together - probably since late 0.3 ivtv
drivers. Looking at the modules load, the PVR-350 shares an
interrupt with one of the tuners of the PVR-500, but the DViCO
FusionHDTV 5 lite does not share an interrupt with any capture or
playback related devices.<br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Does the 350 and *one* other tuner still cause trouble? (Be careful<br>about your ivtv configuration while trying that...)
</blockquote><div><br>
Thanks for the reply, but I'm not sure I'm following you on this.
I've tried the 350 and the DViCO alone, with the PVR-500 physically
removed from the computer, and still see the problems. If I
have only the DViCO FusionHDTV 5 lite and the PVR-500, everything is
solid, (but I have no remote)... Is this what you are
asking? I can't think of a scenario where loading only one
of the PVR-500 tuners along with the PVR-350 and FusionHDTV card would
change anything- but maybe you're thinking of something that I'm
not? Thanks again to all for the replies.<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
</div><br>
</div><br>