<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/12/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">casey dunn</b> <<a href="mailto:casey.dunn@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">casey.dunn@gmail.com
</a>> wrote:</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<span><br></span>Is the 350 physicaly closer to the DViCO than the 500. It may be electical noise?
<br>________________________________________</blockquote><div><br>I
hadn't thought of that, but I did try various positions for all 3
cards, and/or just the PVR-350 and the DViCO, so I think I'd have seen
a difference in one of those combinations. I've sent the question
to the linux-dvb
list and haven't gotten any replies. An HDTV tuner and pvr-350
won't be an often selected hardware combination, as the TV-out of the
pvr-350 won't support HDTV. I'm using it essentially as a
pvr-250. I wonder if the problem would be there with PVR-250 and
the FusionHDTV 5 lite...
I tried sending to ivtv-devel, as I'd wanted to see if anyone there had
ideas about the differences between the 500/150 and the 250/350 to
explain the phenomenon and put me closer to a solution, but the post
was denied by administrator... I assume it was considered off-topic
because the ivtv cards appear to work fine.<br></div><br></div><br>