<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 12, 2007 12:04 PM, Janne Grunau <<a href="mailto:janne-mythtv@grunau.be">janne-mythtv@grunau.be</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Friday 12 October 2007 11:47:57 Nick F wrote:<br>> On 10/12/07, Janne Grunau <<a href="mailto:janne-mythtv@grunau.be">janne-mythtv@grunau.be</a>> wrote:<br>> > the next ffmpeg sync is overdue and working
H.264 PAFF (since 9th<br>> > of october) in ffmpeg is an exellent opportunity.<br>><br>> Great news. A quick (potentially dumb) question before I test the<br>> patch tonight. Will this also support MBAFF as used in BBC HD
<br></div>> H.264transmissions, or is is just PAFF?<br><br>MBAFF is even without the patch supported though MBAFF and spatial<br>direct isn't.<br><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>> My one, and only, HD station is BBC HD via DVB-S, and I'd love to get
<br>> it working. I tried last night (before this patch) on trunk svn<br>> 14660, and it was 'almost' playing smoothly - so hoping this might<br>> push me over the edge.<br><br></div>If it were PAFF the frontend would have segfaulted in seconds. There are
<br>some general improvements in h264 decoding speed which might be enough,<br>the multithreaded decoder scales good as long the stream uses multiple<br>slices and and the supported deblocking types.<br><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
<br>Janne<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br>Does the multithreaded patch spawn enough threads to load a quad core cpu ? <br><br>I notice:<br><br><pre>+ int thread_count = 2;<br></pre>Can that simply be changed to 4 for more threads?
<br><br>Thanks<br>Andy<br></div></div>